|
Search
Calendar
CONTENTS
News
Symbolism
Buddhism
Daily Life
Vajrayana
Karmapa
Lamas
Lang & Lit
Storytime
Prayers
Dying
Links
| |
Ladakh, whose capital is Leh, is officially part of the India's State of
Jammu and Kashmir.
Special to Rediff,
July 5, 2002: Ladakh: The Land of Passes by Claude Arpi
"The scholars do not agree on the etymology of the word Ladakh.
For some, it is the 'Land of the Passes' (la); for others, it is the
'Land of the Lamas.' Whatever the correct interpretation, it is, for both
reasons, certainly one of the most peaceful places on earth.
But, recently, foreign embassies in India decided otherwise; they issued a
circular forbidding their nationals to visit the area which was suddenly
tagged as 'the most dangerous place in the world,' though the ground reality
said otherwise.
Visiting Leh last week, I had the chance to experience the celebrated peace
and hospitality of the region (especially with all the tourists
absent).
A recurrent mistake made by diplomats as well as political commentators is to
equate Kashmir with the state of Jammu and Kashmir, which is vaster (areawise
and politically) than the valley.
As rightly pointed by Dr Karan Singh, the erstwhile Sadar-i-Ryasat and heir
apparent to his father Hari Singh, the last maharaja of Kashmir: 'A common
mistake is to use the word Kashmir as a shorthand for the multi-regional
J&K state and then to proceed politically on this basis. This
approach is the root of many problems.'
Though the Kashmir valley constantly draws the attention of the world media
and the chancelleries in Delhi, it is geographically a very small portion of
the state. In 1947, the area of the state was about 222, 000 sq km. Today,
about 79,000 sq km of that area is occupied by Pakistan, 5, 300 sq km were
generously 'ceded' to China by General Ay[o]ub Khan in 1963 and 37, 000 sq km
were grabbed by China in the early 1950s when Beijing decided to built a road
linking occupied Tibet to Sinkiang.
At the time of Kashmir's accession to India in October 1947, political and
economic power was offered to Sheikh Abdullah's National Conference government
in Srinagar despite the fact that Ladakh covered 70 per cent of the area under
India's administration. Dominated by the successive Kashmiri governments for
the past 50 years, Ladakh has practically been deprived of any say in its
development.
It is interesting to return to the period immediately succeeding the
maharaja's signature on the Instruments of Accession, when raiders from the
North West Frontier Province (the same region where, today, Osama bin Laden
and his Al Qaeda followers seem to have taken refuge) began pouring into the
valley, looting and burning villages in their way and abducting and raping the
women, whether Muslim, Hindu or Sikh. It is only their greed that delayed them
long enough to allow the Indian army to save Srinagar and repulse the raiders
beyond Baramulla. During these first months after Independence, Jinnah and his
colleagues' motto was: 'Let us liberate our Muslim brothers from the
yoke of the Dogras (which term was later replaced by Indians).' The
raiders entered the valley under this pretext.
But the Pakistanis leaders' greed had no limit. Their 'two nations' theory,
according to which the Muslim dominated areas of the subcontinent were to
become part of Pakistan and the Hindus, Sikhs and others were to remain with
India, was thrown into the wind when Karachi decided to 'liberate' their
Buddhist brothers in Ladakh. The motivation for Operation Sledge, which aimed
to take over the vast Ladakh plateau, was not ideological: the treasures of
the Buddhist gompas (monasteries) were a great lure for finance-starved
Pakistan.
In February 1948, when the brigade commander in Srinagar (Brigadier 'Bogey'
Sen) got wind of these plans (the raiders were to comprise of more than 800 of
tribal Pathans mixed with a few Gilgit Scouts), he was in a fix. The
formidable Zoji-la pass was an uncrossable barrier between the valley and
Ladakh and there was no way to airlift reinforcements to Leh. Wheels other
than the dharma chakras were unknown in Ladakh.
It was then that Captain Prithvi Chand, a young Buddhist officer from Lahaul,
the Himalayan region beyond Manali and the Rotang Pass, offered his services;
he told the brigadier he was ready to cross Zoji-la in winter with a small
caravan of men and mules carrying arms and ammunitions. Though Buddhists and
believers in ahimsa, these men were ready to risk their lives and fight their
way through the weather, the altitude and the raiders to defend their
co-religionists in Ladakh. Nobody thought the mission feasible, but
there was no other solution.
So without the knowledge of army headquarters -- which was reluctant to permit
such a risky operation -- the young captain crossed the pass with about 60
volunteers and reached safely Leh to prepare a surprise for the raiders.
It was first of a long saga of heroic acts by the young officers of these
mountainous regions who, since then, have bravely defended Indian territory.
One should mention Colonel Chewwang Rinchen, who was twice awarded the Mahavir
Chakra -- first for having stopped the advance of raiders in the Nubra Valley
in June 1948 and the second for the bravery he displayed in the Turtuk sector
in December 1971.
More recently, Major Sonam Wangchuk (another Buddhist soldier to be awarded
the MVC) and his Ladakh Scouts recaptured some of the crucial peaks occupied
by Pakistan during the Kargil war in 1999. One still has the image of Wangchuk,
praying to the Dalai Lama, the incarnated Bodhisattva of Compassion, to give
him the strength to save his nation, India.
These Buddhist heroes had to first fight their own non-violent Buddhist
principles before they could take on the invaders; they knew the survival of
their dharma was at stake. They had heard tales of the fall of Gilgit, where
the scouts led by Major Brown, a British officer, had revolted against the
Dogra garrison and invited Pakistan to take over the administration. In the
days that followed, Hindus and Sikhs were given a few minutes to decide if
they wanted to adopt the Islamic faith or die.
Immediately after the Accession, the Ladakhis took the stand that their future
was linked with India, though culturally, racially and linguistically they
were closer to Tibet, the source of their inspiration and religion.
Ladakh finally became a part of India when General Thimmaya won the most
extraordinary battle of modern warfare, taking his tanks to the top of Zoji-la
to the utter surprise and disbelief of the raiders who immediately fled.
Though these heroes had rescued more than half of the maharaja's territory,
the Ladakhis were still very unhappy. They had saved their dharma, but were
getting entangled in the Kashmir problem. They had no interest in Sheikh
Abdullah's political games which were aimed at getting the valley an
independent status. (In December 1947, the Sheikh even asked Hari Singh to
continue to be maharaja of Jammu, Kathua and Udhampur while he would be the
ruler of an independent Islamic republic. The fate of Ladakh, Baltistan,
Gilgit was not mentioned in the Sheikh's proposal.)
In May 1949, the first delegation of the Young Men's Buddhist Association of
Ladakh led by Kalon Chhewang Rigzin met Nehru in Delhi and presented him a
memorandum: 'We seek the bosom of that gracious Mother India to receive more
nutriment for growth to our full stature in every way. She has given us what
we prize above all things -- our religion and culture.'
It is interesting to note that Abdullah was fighting for a separate flag for
the state, even as the Ladakhis glowed with pride on seeing the Asoka wheel on
the Indian flag. Ladakh saw in it the symbol of 'goodwill for all humanity and
her concern for her cultural children.' They prayed to Nehru: 'Will the Great
Mother refuse to take into her arms one of her weakest and most forlorn and
depressed children -- a child whom filial love impels to respond to the call?'
Unfortunately, India's leaders, beginning with the Kashmiri Pandit, Nehru, did
not respond to Ladakh's appeal. An eyewitness to this first meeting told me
Nehru smiled and explained he was sympathetic with their views but 'Kashmir
was now an international problem and India could not afford to take any hasty
actions which could spoil the good Indian case in the UN.'
Of course, 53 years later, the reference to the good case seems laughable, but
the attitude of most Indian leaders continues to remain unchanged. 'We cannot
afford to antagonise Srinagar' remains the motto.
We can see today where this policy of appeasement has led us!
This is the shocking contrast -- on one side, some self-styled leaders refused
to go through the recognised democratic system of elections and daily asked
for more autonomy from the Indian state and, on the other side, the peaceful
people Ladakh begging for more integration with India. In Leh, one understands
the frustration of the ordinary Ladakhi who asks: "But what have they
[the Kashmiris] done to deserve so much attention and advantages?"
In 1989, faced with Delhi's decade-long apathy and the 'larger issue of
Kashmir', the Ladakhis had no alternative but to resort to an 'agitation,' an
concept alien to Buddhism. When Kushok Bakula Rinpoche, the head Lama of
Ladakh and long-time minister in Srinagar (he recently retired as India's
ambassador to Mongolia), began to defend the interests of Ladakh in the early
fifties, he probably knew about the fate of the Jammu agitation and the tragic
end of its leader Shyama Prasad Mookerjee, who had dared to object to the
Sheikh; Mookerjee, who believed India should have 'one flag, one constitution,
one President,' lost his life in the process.
As a Buddhist teacher, Bakula did not choose the path of confrontation; he
tried to get more autonomy for his region by working with the system.
But this method also failed.
A greater autonomy and closer links with India were not granted till the
Ladakh Buddhist Association organised their non-violent movement in 1989, soon
after the elections were rigged in the state and Pakistan began its proxy war
in the valley. Due to the 'insurgency,' the region wanting to join Pakistan
was pampered and appeased with more and more incentives, while Ladakh, crying
to be one with India, was told to wait because their demand for Union
territory status could not be granted at this point of time.
One of the main hurdles was the existence of Article 370 in the Indian
Constitution: the concurrence of the state assembly where the valley has the
majority is required for any change, however minor.
When I recently interviewed Ladakhi leaders in Leh, most of them, including
the chairman of the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Council, Thupstan
Chhewang felt Article 370 should be abrogated. The autonomy they demand is not
an autonomy from India, but an autonomy from Srinagar with whom they do not
share common problems and aspirations. Many of my informants consider 1947 not
as the independence of Ladakh but its enslavement to the leaders of the
Kashmir valley.
This went to such an extent that, in 1952, when Sheikh Abdullah presented the
state's budget to the constituent assembly, he forgot Ladakh. When Bakula
protested in a strongly worded speech, Abdullah asked his speech to be
expunged from the records under the pretext that it was in English and not in
Urdu.
After many frustrating decades, Ladakh was finally offered an Autonomous Hill
Development Council as a compromise in 1995. Though the chairman and his
executives councillors (ministers) have vast executive powers on paper, they
often face a frustrating situation with Srinagar, which is not really
interested in their problems and has the ability to block the system.
This strange situation is compounded by the fact that the Hill Council
has been elected on the ticket of the Congress party, which is against
the trifurcation of the state and not presently in power at the Centre.
Under these circumstances, it is difficult to see how the aspirations of the
Ladakhis can be fulfilled in the near future. Though they will be returning
four MLAs in the forthcoming assembly election in the state, it is doubtful if
the situation of the most strategic region of India will substantially
improve.
Some people in Leh have pinned their hope on the younger Abdullah (Omar),
feeling he will be more sympathetic to their plight because of his modern
education and outlook. But, ultimately, the situation of the three regions can
change only when each side is able to decide about its own needs and
development priorities. For the ordinary Ladakhi, it is difficult to
understand why the Centre, while continually appeasing the valley, has refused
to allow the population of Ladakh and Jammu choose their own destiny and come
closer to India.
The abrogation of Article 370 should certainly be the first step towards the
integration of these regions. One flag and one Constitution is enough for the
Ladakhis.
Some other actions could help reduce the frustration of the gentle people of
Ladakh. One is the opening of an all-weather road from Spiti valley to Leh via
Tsomiriri lake. Today, the two main highways are closed for more than seven
months in a year. The opening of the old trade and pilgrimage route to Kailash
in Tibet will also help; this would render Leh only three days away from
Mansarovar and boost the local economy.
The creation of a local party that could ally directly with the Centre and
lend force to the demands of the Ladakhis could also go a long towards helping
their voice to be heard in Delhi. It should not be too difficult since the new
deputy prime minister, L K Advani, recently rediscovered his roots on the
banks of the Sindhu (Indus) river flowing through Ladakh.
But it is imperative not to forget Ladakh's special location: it is the only
region in India facing two enemies -- the Chinese 'Liberation Army' on the
high plateau of Aksai Chin and Linzinthang in the north, with Tibet in the
west and Pakistan in the east. The region is also the scene of battle for the
strategic Siachen glacier, which connects the old caravan route to Kashgar
through the Karakoram pass.
And one should also not forget that, in times of difficulty, the Ladakhis have
always cast their lot with India."
_____________________________________________________
[ Back ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next ]
[ Afghanistan ] [ Bhutan ] [ Burma ] [ Ladakh ] [ Nepal ] [ Sikkim ] [ Tibet ] [ SE Asia ]
|